Claims register

The POTS claims register

Published 2026-08-25

Every outward statement we make about the POTS ecosystem maps to a row below. Each one names its public source, and several carry a note on how the wording must be hedged. Underneath is the harder half: the things we decline to say, and why.

We publish both halves because a verification standard that only ever shows its conclusions is indistinguishable from confidence. The refusals are the part you can actually hold us to.

What we assert

Sourced to public protocol documentation. “Hedged wording required” means the underlying source states something more strongly than we are willing to repeat.

• C1Verified

  In its standard flow, you sign each Pots Market order with EIP-712 from your own wallet.

  This describes how orders are signed, not who holds funds. No official POTS source states Pots Market’s custody model, so we do not call it non-custodial. An earlier version of this entry did, on the word of a site POTS has since told us is not theirs.

  Sources: Pots Market app (pots.market) — its own code, checked 2026-09-11 · docs.polymarket.com — placing orders

• C2Verified

  Pots Market routes orders to Polymarket’s order book (CLOB).

  Polymarket documents its own system: off-chain matching, on-chain settlement. That Pots Market uses it is shown by the Pots Market app, not by Polymarket’s documentation.

  Sources: Pots Market app (pots.market) — its own code, checked 2026-09-11 · docs.polymarket.com — prices & orderbook

• C3Verified — hedged wording required

  POTS documentation states that every IBS is backed by at least $1 in protocol-owned liquidity, with a $1 redemption floor.

  A designed floor, subject to market risk — never our own guarantee, whatever words the documentation uses. We no longer say it is “not a peg”: that phrasing came from a site that is not POTS’s, and POTS’s documentation itself uses the word “peg” in places.

  Sources: docs.pots.money — IBS, the future money · docs.pots.money — intelligent bonding

• C4Verified

  The Smart Treasury has four layers: V_LP, T_RBS, T_ST and T_PBM, each with a documented role.

  Sources: docs.pots.money — smart treasury

• C5Verified

  The Safety Treasury is a 25-of-50 multisig: 25 of its 50 signers must approve any transaction it makes.

  Documented, and checked on-chain: the Safe’s own contract reports its threshold and signer count. We scope the claim to this Safe because it is what we have checked. The chain shows 50 signer addresses; it cannot show who holds them.

  Sources: docs.pots.money — governance · on-chain — Safe 0x5BB0…28Ce: threshold 25, 50 owners

• C6Verified — hedged wording required

  Protocol revenue funds an IBS buy-back-and-burn mechanism and the Safety Treasury.

  Described as a designed mechanism only. We never imply a resulting price effect.

  Sources: docs.pots.money — intelligent bonding (YRF) · docs.pots.money — smart treasury

• C7Verified — hedged wording required

  POTS documentation states the protocol has been audited, with reports publicly available.

  We cite that audits are stated and reports are stated public. We do not characterise audit findings — we have not reviewed them, and neither has the reader.

  Sources: docs.pots.money — security

• C8Verified

  Governance voting weight uses vIBS, a non-transferable credential minted by staking IBS.

  vIBS is the voting credential. It is not the same as the $POTS token, and we never conflate the two.

  Sources: docs.pots.money — governance

What we do not assert

These are categories, stated deliberately without repeating the specific figures involved. Restating an unsourced number in order to dispute it still puts the number into circulation.

• That EIP-712 signing prevents front-running.

  EIP-712 is a typed-data signing standard establishing order integrity and authorship. No source we accept supports an anti-front-running property, and we have found material elsewhere that makes this claim incorrectly.

• Any promised or guaranteed yield, return, price appreciation, or floor outcome.

  Excluded regardless of how a source words it. Where documentation uses guarantee language, we still say “designed mechanism”, “documentation states”, and “subject to market risk”.

• Exact treasury balances, participant counts, performance milestones, or audit conclusions.

  Not retrievable from sources we accept. A figure circulating in promotional material is not a sourced figure, and publishing one to dispute it would only spread it further.

• Terms we cannot define from documentation.

  Where an acronym or mechanism appears in marketing material without a definition in the documentation, we do not use it until it is defined in a source we accept.

• That live parameters are fixed.

  Rates, fees and terms change — some by governance vote. We point to the application at the moment of action rather than printing a number that goes stale.

• That Pots Market is non-custodial.

  No official POTS source states its custody model. That you sign orders from your own wallet (C1) is a fact about signing, not about who can hold or move funds.

How to use this

If you see a statement about POTS attributed to TOBB that isn’t supported by a row above, treat it as not ours. If you think a row is wrong, that is worth telling us — a register nobody challenges isn’t doing its job.

Parameters that change — rates, fees, terms, and anything set by governance vote — are deliberately absent. Read those in the application at the moment they matter, not from a page that was written earlier.

Educational content only — nothing here is financial advice. Decentralized systems carry market and technical risk. Verify before you interact.