Research & Advocacy
What we publish, and what we won’t
Source-cited analyses of the systems we study. Every claim here traces to a source you can check. Where something can’t be verified, we say so — and we publish that list too, because a standard nobody can audit isn’t a standard.
- Scorecard
We Ran Our Own Checklist on the Project We Advocate
POTS scored against the Verifier’s Checklist. A real audit, a working 25-of-50 multisig and a provably burned LP pass cleanly; six upgradeable core contracts controlled by single keys do not match what the documentation promises. POTS was told privately first; its response is recorded.
Read → - Checklist
The Verifier’s Checklist
Ten questions to check any crypto project before you trust it — audits, keys, minting, upgradeable contracts — each with the steps to answer it yourself. It scores no project, and it says plainly what it cannot tell you.
Read → - Governance digest
Governance digest — August 2026
Seven POTS proposals closed in August; we cover the three that set the parameters now in force. What changed, what it supersedes — the CBT unlock schedule moved twice, so older material is now wrong — and what remains undocumented.
Read → - Archive
The published archive
Posts published elsewhere, kept here with permanent addresses. Text verified against its recorded content hash, and curated to the claims register rather than mirrored wholesale.
Read → - Claims register
The POTS claims register
Every claim we make about the POTS ecosystem, its verification status and its public source — together with what we refuse to assert, and why. This is the standard itself, written down.
Read →
Shorter notes and threads are posted as they happen on X (@tobbworld). Anything load-bearing ends up here, where it has a permanent address and can be cited.